Don Brown represented himself as one of the 4,000 Texans who signed the 'Secure the Bid' petition supporting SB75.
HB2555 allowed transmission and distribution utilities to seek approval for resiliency measures, but it was voluntary and not all TDUs have submitted plans.
SB75 codifies Governor Abbott's executive order to address issues such as electromagnetic pulses.
Extensive cost study on risks like electromagnetic pulses and solar storms suggests solutions are financially viable.
Protecting the grid through new technology is cost-effective, with costs amounting to only one-thousandth of the $33 billion 765-kV line project.
Mentioned that technology is already in use at Centerpoint and Tennessee Valley Authority.
Don Brown provided a handout with detailed figures and thanked the committee for their time.
Mark Bell testified on behalf of the Association of Electric Companies of Texas (AECT) regarding SB75.
The testimony expressed neutrality on SB75 but raised concerns about its current form not addressing all critical infrastructure needs for the electric grid.
Mark Bell highlighted the lessons learned from winter storm Uri, emphasizing the interconnectedness of the Texas electric grid.
AECT supports Governor Abbott's executive order, GA-49, which focuses on protecting electric critical infrastructure comprehensively.
Concerns were raised that SB75 could lead to significant consumer costs and lacks a comprehensive system view.
AECT recommends that SB75 align with GA-49, suggesting that the Texas Grid Security Commission make recommendations on infrastructure and the electric supply chain.
They propose the evaluation of state preparedness for specific scenarios and recommend cost estimation for implementing these recommendations.
Reference was made to the existing resiliency plan passed in the last session.
Mark Bell acknowledged Colonel Wilson's attention to concerns and expressed readiness to collaborate on language improvements.
Reed expressed opposition to using taxpayer funds for constructing new nuclear plants, but supported using funds to train workers for safe construction.
There were areas of agreement and some disagreements on policy.
No further questions were posed to the witness, Cyrus Reed.
No additional testimony for or against SB1535 was presented.
The committee substitute was withdrawn without objection.